Arctic Ecotoxicology: A Critical Review to Break the Ice
There has been a growing focus to quantify the impact of anthropogenic activities on Arctic ecosystems; however, most regulatory guidelines and risk assessments are built primarily around temperate species. This may result in an underestimation of harm to Arctic organisms. To help address this concern, a critical review to assess reported effects for these species in relation to current regulatory guidelines, quantify knowledge and methodological gaps, and identify future research needs for laboratory testing was performed. To accomplish this, an objective evaluation of the literature was employed to quantify the strengths and relevance of published studies to determine the utility of the data. We developed uniform criteria to score each study, allowing an objective comparison across experiments. Data from all publicly available toxicity tests performed on aquatic Arctic algae (n = 22 distinct experiments), invertebrates (n = 167), vertebrates (n = 149) and microbial consortiums (n = 1) were included. These data encompassed a total of 44 published studies, 48 tested compounds, and 74 unique Arctic test species. Our preliminary analysis shows that of 339 test substance and species combinations scored, 273(81%) failed to meet at least one critical study criterion that contributes to data reliability for use in risk assessment. Future Arctic ecotoxicology research should work to ensure test concentrations can be analytically confirmed, include environmentally realistic exposure scenarios, and report test methods more thoroughly. By working to address these identified gaps, future ecotoxicological risk assessments for Arctic regions should be more robust and effective.